your AI content sounds generic because your workflow is backwards

Every week, same story: some founder shows me their "AI-powered content strategy" and it's just ChatGPT with keywords stuffed into it like a Thanksgiving turkey.

They dropped $2000 on Jasper or Copy.ai, fed it "productivity tips for remote workers," and got back 1,200 words of LinkedIn thought-leader soup. Perfectly SEO-optimized. Grammatically flawless. Completely forgettable.

"But it ranks!" they say, showing me their Google Analytics like a proud parent. Sure, it ranks. So does every other regurgitated productivity listicle from the past five years. Ranking for competitive keywords without converting is just expensive performance art.

Here's what's actually happening: you're asking AI to write before teaching it who you are. It's like hiring a copywriter, refusing to tell them about your business, and then getting mad when they sound like everyone else.

The problem isn't the AI. The problem is you're starting in the middle of the process instead of the beginning.

Feeding Keywords to AI Is Like Asking a Stranger to Tell Your Story

Here's the broken workflow I see everywhere:

1. Find keyword with good search volume
2. Paste keyword into AI tool
3. Generate article
4. Publish and pray

Congratulations, you've just created content indistinguishable from 47,000 other articles about "boosting team productivity." The AI looked at the most statistically average content on that topic and gave you... the most statistically average content on that topic.

You know what AI doesn't know?

• That your productivity software was built because you watched your best developer burn out from Slack notifications • Your founder refuses to use the word "optimization" because it sounds like Silicon Valley bullshit
• Your customers are creative agency owners who think most productivity advice was clearly written by people who've never managed a creative process

Feed the machine keywords, get keyword-optimized content. Feed it context, get content that actually means something.

The Three Things AI Needs to Know Before It Writes Word One

Before you touch any "generate" button, AI needs your brand's DNA embedded in its brain. Not your mission statement. Your actual personality.

Your Unique Market Perspective

Not "we believe in productivity." Everyone believes in productivity. What do you believe about productivity that everyone else gets wrong?

Ours: "Most productivity advice assumes all work is the same. Creative work doesn't follow the same rules as data entry, and pretending it does is why most creative teams are miserable."

That's not SEO content. That's a point of view that shapes every piece we create.

Your Customer's Real Pain Points

Not their search queries. Their 3am problems.

Search query: "How to increase team productivity"
Actual problem: "My creative team spends more time in status meetings than creating, but when I try to reduce meetings, projects fall apart"

One creates generic advice. The other creates content that makes people feel seen.

Your Voice's DNA

Not "conversational tone." Your specific conversational tone.

We never say "leverage." We never promise "game-changing results." We always admit when we don't know something. We use "folks" not "users." We think anyone who calls customers "personas" has spent too much time in conference rooms.

Program that into AI, and suddenly it stops sounding like every other SaaS company.

Strategy Before Generation: The Conversation Gap Method

While your competitors are chasing the same keywords, we use AI to find the conversations they're ignoring.

Here's how: feed AI your customer's actual problems (not their search terms) and ask it to identify the gaps between what people are searching for and what they actually need solved.

Example:

People search: "Remote team communication tools"
What they actually need: "How to stop remote work from turning every decision into a 47-message Slack thread"

The second topic has zero search volume. It also has zero competition and infinite gratitude from anyone who's lived through death-by-Slack.

This is where AI gets genuinely useful: pattern recognition across thousands of conversations to spot the holes in existing content. Not to write the content. To find the content worth writing.

The Smart Brief: Giving AI Context, Not Just Keywords

Instead of: "Write an article about productivity tips"

Try this: "You're writing for creative agency owners who think most productivity advice was designed by accountants. They've tried every system and tool, but their teams still miss deadlines because creative work is unpredictable. They need frameworks that work with creative chaos, not against it. Write from the perspective that most productivity advice ignores the reality of creative work. Avoid any advice that requires everyone to work exactly the same way. Include specific examples of how different creative roles (designers, writers, strategists) might use the same system differently."

See the difference? One generates generic advice. The other generates content for a specific human with specific problems and specific allergies to certain types of solutions.

The AI now has constraints that force creativity instead of statistical averaging.

The 70% Rule: AI Drafts, Humans Inject Soul

AI should get you to 70% of done, not 100%. That last 30% is where the magic happens.

The AI gives you structure, research, and competent writing. You add:

• Your actual opinions (not just industry best practices) • Specific stories from your customers • Data from your own experiments • The insights that only come from doing the thing you're writing about

That 30% is what separates content that ranks from content that converts.

Most people treat AI output like it's finished. Wrong. Treat it like a research assistant handed you a really good first draft. Now make it yours.

Context-Aware Editing: The Step Everyone Skips

This isn't proofreading. This is value injection.

Run the AI draft through your brand filter:

• Does this sound like something we'd actually say? • Are we avoiding our banned words and phrases? • Would our ideal customer recognize this as content specifically for them? • What stories or examples can we add that AI couldn't know about?

Then use AI again to check consistency: "Does this article match the tone and perspective of [paste your best existing content]? Identify any sections that feel off-brand."

AI becomes quality control for its own output. Surprisingly effective.

The Multiplier Effect: One Article, Five Platforms

Here's where the workflow gets genuinely clever.

That one article becomes:

• 5 LinkedIn posts (different angles) • 10 Twitter threads (different hooks) • 1 email newsletter (different tone) • 3 short videos (key points extracted) • 15 social graphics (key quotes visualized)

AI handles the repurposing. You handle the strategy.

Instead of creating 34 pieces of content, you created one great piece and let AI translate it into 34 formats. Same ideas, different contexts.

What This Actually Looks Like: The Before and After

Generic AI article about remote work productivity:
"10 Essential Tips for Remote Team Productivity: Boost Your Team's Performance Today"

Opens with statistics about remote work growth. Lists obvious tips like "use video calls" and "set clear expectations." Concludes with generic call-to-action about trying productivity tools.

Result: 47 other articles exist with the exact same advice.

Brand-led AI article:
"Why Your Remote Team's Productivity System Is Failing (And It's Not What You Think)"

Opens with: "Your remote team isn't unproductive because they lack tools. They're unproductive because you're managing creative work like factory work."

Includes specific stories about creative teams. Challenges conventional remote work advice. Offers frameworks instead of tips.

Result: People share it because it says something they haven't heard before.

Same AI. Same keyword target. Completely different business impact.

The New Workflow: Strategy First, AI Second

Here's your new checklist before hitting "generate" on anything:

• What unique perspective does our brand bring to this topic? • What specific problems do our customers have that search queries don't capture? • What would our brand never say about this topic? • What stories or examples can we include that AI can't invent? • How will we repurpose this across platforms?

Answer those first. Then use AI.

The companies still starting with keywords are producing content that sounds like everyone else's because they're using the same inputs as everyone else.

The companies winning are using AI as an amplifier for their unique perspective, not a replacement for having one.

You want content that builds a business? Stop asking AI to think for you. Start asking it to think with you.

The machine gets smarter. But only if you get strategic first.

📨 waitlist signup here